A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2016, the Defendant assaulted “D cafeteria” located in Ansan-si, Masan-si, the Defendant received 112 reports, and solicited F to return home from the police officer affiliated with F of the Ansan-gu, Police Station E box called at the site, which was sent to the site, on the one hand, the face of the said F at one time, and assaulted F F F’s bucks and maris about 10 times by walking bucks and maris.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. To serve a stop in the E box (to do so);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the instant photographs and CCTV-related photographs records;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor (the following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing shall be considered):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is [the scope of recommendation] and the basic area (from June to January 4) of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the grounds for sentencing) (the grounds for sentencing) (the grounds for obstructing the performance of official duties and obstructing the performance of official duties) (the person subject to special sentencing from June to January 4)] (the decision of sentencing] of the instant crime is disadvantageous to the fact that the nature of the instant

However, in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, and that the defendant has no particular criminal history, and the conditions of the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the same sentence as the order shall be determined.