logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.08.06 2015고정206
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as the director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. in Ansan-gu, has a share in the above company, and the defendant, in collusion with E, around April 8, 2014, around the first floor of the above company, E had the head of division F, the certificate of remittance owned by the victim G and the document bags containing the documents related to the above company, and the defendant was cut off with it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. The application of each police interrogation protocol of the defendant and Eul (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that F was not a theft of document bags as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant, but that F was a fry of this case, considering the above evidence, it is acknowledged that the defendant conspired with E and stolen document bags owned by the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below).

1. Relevant Articles 329 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 329 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel, as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the defendant, have to keep the envelope back from the beginning, but there is no intention of illegal acquisition, and the defendant has the right to view the company documents as a shareholder of the company, and therefore, illegality is excluded as it constitutes a justifiable act.

2. In cases where another person's property is used without the consent of the possessor without permission, the use of the property in itself is so consumed or used that the economic value of the property was considerable, or it is disposed of in another place other than the original one, or it occupies the long time without the return thereof;

arrow