1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. In around 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to operate a business of constructing two multi-household houses (hereinafter “instant loan”) on the ground of 1,215 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) prior to Gwangju-si, which are Defendant D ownership, to operate a business of operating two multi-household houses (hereinafter “instant loan”), but the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to distribute revenues each of 1/2. At that time, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to participate in the instant business, thereby investing KRW 130,000,000,000 business capital from G from G, and upon completion of the instant business in the future, the Plaintiff paid the total amount of the principal of the investment and KRW 1,00,000,000 to G.

B. In relation to the business relationship between the Plaintiff, G, and four Defendants, Defendant E was the husband and the representative of Defendant D, and the Plaintiff was the representative of G, respectively.

C. The Defendants received a loan of KRW 465,00,000 on April 19, 2010 from H with the name of H to provide the construction cost, etc. required for the instant project, and subsequently, received money from I.D.

On January 201, 201, a total of 16 units of the loan of this case, composed of A Dong and B, was completed on the ground of the instant land. Of the loan of this case, A Dong was completed in the name of G, and B Dong was completed in the name of Defendant D, respectively.

E. On June 20, 201, I provided Defendant D with an additional loan of KRW 100 million (hereinafter “instant loan”).

On August 16, 2011, the Plaintiff and Defendant E issued to I a promissory note with a face value of KRW 100 million, and on April 17, 2012, written a notarial deed on the said promissory note.

The instant loan was used as construction cost necessary for the instant project, and Defendant D paid interest on the instant loan to I from July 201 to February 2012.

F. The Plaintiff, G, and the Defendants attempted to pay the construction price and the loans with the price received by selling the instant loan, but the instant loan is sold in lots.