1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s mother, on October 2, 1984, purchased from F 393 square meters in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 29, 1994. 2) The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 29, 1994 with respect to the land adjacent to the above E-type 393 square meters in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun, Gwangju District Court Head of the District Court, No. 19952, Sept. 14, 1994, for sale on October 2, 1985.

3) On April 3, 2012, the Defendant divided the G 926 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, into G 721 square meters and C 205 square meters in lots. 4) On October 16, 2013, the Defendant donated the G G 721 square meters and C 205 square meters in lots to ASEAN, Jeonnam-gun, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and on the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of H on each of the above lands.

5) On April 7, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) donated 393 square meters from Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun; and (b) completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 10, 2015; (b) the current status of the land 1) the current status of 721 square meters and C large 205 square meters in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun; (b) the current status of the land 721 square meters and C large 205 square meters are the same as the adjacent drawings; (c) cement bricks

2) On the ground of the above C large 205 square meters, there exists a unregistered warehouse building D newly built. The Plaintiff currently occupies and uses the said unregistered warehouse building. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 7, and 8 (if there is a lot number, it includes a lot number).

(1) Each entry and video of subparagraph (1) and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion as the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim completed the statute of limitations for acquisition by occupying the instant land in peace and openly with the intent to own the instant land for at least 20 years from October 2, 2004, after purchasing from I the buildings adjacent to Da large 205 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and buildings unregistered on the ground, which were not registered on the instant land, and the construction of a warehouse. The Plaintiff received the donation of the instant land from Da on April 7, 2015, from Da to 393 square meters and the instant land.