1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;

2. Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

No cultural heritage belonging to movable property, among unregistered or unregistered cultural heritage, shall be exported or taken out of the Republic of Korea.

Nevertheless, at around 16:15 on March 1, 2013, the Defendant, at the port of departure of the International Passenger Terminal from Incheon Port No. 1 International Passenger Terminal, (No. 15) and at the time, intended to conceal 300 square meters (No. 2) of the delay from the port of the Republic of Korea to take out to the Republic of Korea, and to conceal 100 square meters (No. 2) of the 300s (No. 3) of the 300s (No. 12) of the 12s (No. 3) of the 12s (No. 12) of the 12s (No. 3) of the 300s (No. 12s) of the 100s (No. 1

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes to reply to written expert opinions, such as the case details, the statement of detection status, the third party delay, etc., response to written expert opinions of seized cultural heritage (KBS C broadcasting content), investigation reports (investigation of the contents of broadcasting), investigation reports (investigation of the entrusted storage of seized cultural heritage), investigation reports (Investigation of the entrusted storage of seized cultural heritage), and investigation reports (Investigation of the

1. Articles 90 (2), 60 (1), and 39 (1) of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act applicable to facts constituting an offense, and Articles 97 (1), 90 (2), 60 (1), and 39 (1) of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (a point of attempt to remove) of the same Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 90(2) of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act for forfeiture has been led to the confession of all crimes that the defendant was not discovered during the investigation process, and the fact that the defendant again submitted to the investigation agency and the defendant had taken them out to China in a sense that his depth pening the crimes. The defendant around 200.