1. The Plaintiffs confirm that they are in the position of a cash clearing agent from April 15, 2014.

2. The plaintiffs' primary claim and 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is the Housing Redevelopment Project Association that obtained authorization for establishment from the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the head of Seongdong-gu”) on December 22, 2006 to implement the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project whose project implementation area covers 100,66.39 square meters in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu.

B. On May 22, 1984, Plaintiff A acquired a 142 square meters in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F. F. 142 square meters and a 39.67 square meters in a multi-story factory (general factory) on the above ground, and Plaintiff B, C. and Nonparty G acquired 1/3 of their respective shares in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H large 56 square meters and its ground trees and 23.14 square meters in a multi-story living facility (hereinafter “second-story real estate”) located within the above business area on December 10, 204.

On the other hand, the plaintiff A is the former owner of the second real estate in this case, and is the father of the plaintiff B, C and non-party G.

C. The Defendant received the application for parcelling-out from August 14, 2007 to September 13, 2007 from the owners of land, etc., and on September 12, 2007, the Plaintiff A filed an application for parcelling-out with the Defendant for parcelling-out by stating that the instant real estate No. 1 was the right and that it was “a prize” in the column of opinion wishing to parcel out.

Plaintiff

B, C, and Non-Party G appointed B as the representative owner, and applied for the application to the Defendant for parcelling-out by stating the title of the instant 2 real estate within the above period for application for parcelling-out as “housing” in the opinion column for parcelling-out.

On the other hand, on December 5, 2007, Plaintiff B and C acquired 1/6 of the shares of G from G from December 5, 2007.

The Defendant: (a) on the basis that Plaintiff A lives as Plaintiff C and one household, based on the aggregate value of Plaintiff A’s right to real estate No. 1 of the instant real estate No. 2 of the instant real estate No. 3 of the Plaintiff C, the “house” is sold to Plaintiff A, and (b) the building among the instant real estate No. 2 is not a house, and the land among the instant real estate No. 2 of the instant real estate.