1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended by this court is dismissed.

3...

1. According to the citing the judgment of the court of first instance, Defendant B is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 13,050,000,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,050,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 11,450,000 for the damages amounting to KRW 3,450,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 3,450,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 15,00 for the damages amounting to KRW 3,450 for the damages amounting to KRW 8,00 for the damages amount

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that Defendant B used “Defendant B 50,000,000 won” and Defendant C “20,000,000 won” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Defendant C used “Defendant B 5,00,000 won, and KRW 8,00,000 for Defendant C” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Defendant C used the third 4-6 part as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. The plaintiff's claim for damages for delay extended by this court (13,050,000 won against defendant B, and 11,450,000 won against defendant C, respectively, for damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from April 1, 2015 to August 26, 2015, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum from June 10, 2016 to the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case) are also dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.