Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above judgment against the Defendants for two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2016, the Defendants: (a) committed assault, such as assaulting the victim H (23 tax)’s face that Defendant A she faced with the victim G (23 tax) in the front corridor of the Dong-gu and the 2nd floor “F” restaurant at Ilyang-gu, U.S. on December 10, 2016; (b) Defendant A took the victim’s face one time at the victim’s face; (c) Defendant B took the victim’s face one time at the victim’s face; and (d) Defendant B took the victim’s body one time at the victim’s face; and (e) Defendant C took the victim’s face at three times; and (e) took the victim’s face and the victim’s body several times.

The Defendants jointly committed an injury to the victim G, i.e., a 4-day therapy, and an injury to the victim G, i.e., a 2-day therapy for the victim I, respectively, and assaulted the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act regarding the crime, each of the choice of punishment, Article 2(2)3 of the same Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint violence) and each of the choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The crime of this case is committed jointly by the defendants, causing injury to the victims, or assaulting them, and its nature is not good.

The extent of violence committed by the defendants to victims is considerably serious, and in particular, the degree of injury suffered by the victims G is very serious.

Defendants did not agree with the victims of injury.

The defendants are recognized as committing a crime and are against the law.

The Defendants are involved in the instant case by chance under the influence of alcohol.