logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.24 2017고단2722
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for six months, for each of six months.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants knew the fact that the victim D want to obtain a loan in order to raise business funds, and conspired to obtain money such as entertainment expenses by accessing the Defendant C as if the victim was affiliated with E and the victim could help facilitate the loan.

Accordingly, the defendant A will arrange a loan to the victim on June 2015 because he is well aware of the victim's work experience, F branch, etc.

The defendant B, who received a loan, had the victim met with the introduction of the defendant A after this framework, had judged the victim's "a large number of loan work from the G branch," and had worked with A for the degree of 2 to 3 years.

After that, Defendant A and Defendant B introduced Defendant C to the victim, and Defendant C also presented that “C is a person who will grant the principal loan to the Seoul E director,” and Defendant C also presented that the victim is the F director, and was acting as the E director.

On November 2015, Defendant B continued to call the victim at an influence place, and made a false statement to the effect that “A director who helps to facilitate the lending of loans and who aided C E to do so shall be a person.” On December 2, 2015, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “I would have to take personnel affairs with the head of the F branch in order to have the loans passed the last time after they called the victim at an influence place.”

However, in fact, Defendant C was not a director, and there was no fact that the loan was made, and even if the victim received money from the victim, the Defendants thought to consume it for personal purposes and did not have the intent or ability to use it as personnel expenses related to the loan.

The Defendants, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, are cash 2.26 November 2015 from the victim under the pretext of personnel expenses.

arrow