Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 18,238,517 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 14, 2014 to June 8, 2016.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company whose business purpose is construction business, civil engineering construction business, etc., and the Defendant is the owner of the land located in Daejeon Seo-gu C.
Standard contract for private construction works
3. Date of commencement: September 25, 2013.
4. Date scheduled for completion: March 12, 2014.
5. Contract amount: 36,752,00 won (value-added tax): 129,520,000 won (value-added tax): 12,952,00 won (value-added tax): 194,280,00 won (value-added tax); and
6. Contract bond: 33,675,200 won: Warranty bond rate of the contract amount for each type of work and the warranty period of the amount which are 36,752,00 won (3) 10,102,560 won; 10. Warranty bond, 10. 10. 10. 10
B. On September 23, 2013, the Defendant decided to construct a neighborhood living facility and multi-family house building (hereinafter “instant building”) on the said land, and ordered the Plaintiff to undertake construction works for building construction (hereinafter “instant construction”).
The main contents of the contract document prepared on the same day (Evidence A 1-1, hereinafter referred to as the "instant contract document") are as follows:
C. The instant construction was completed around March 13, 2014.
[Based on recognition] In concluding the instant contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiff’s assertion on the Plaintiff’s ground of claim as to the entry of Gap’s evidence No. 1-1, and the purport of the entire argument, the Defendant agreed to additionally receive KRW 98,814,939 for indirect construction costs, such as industrial accident insurance premiums, employment insurance premiums, and general management expenses (including value added tax) in addition to the construction cost under the instant contract.
In addition, in the course of the construction process, the plaintiff changed the design at the request of the defendant and implemented additional construction costs of KRW 59,983,358.
After the completion of the new construction of this case, 1,105,00 won (including value-added tax) was incurred for the construction of the reinforcement floor upon the defendant's request.
Defendant.