1. Of the instant lawsuit, the claim portion against the claims in the separate sheet shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant shall pay 3,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant: (a) as the head of C Village, borrowed money from the staff of the Myeon Office for D Corporation at the time of 2006, received delayed construction expenses from the Plaintiff, who was the head of C Village, and repaid them to the staff of the Myeon Office; and (b) even though the president of E Company did not receive expenses for senior care from F, with the intention of having the Plaintiff not be elected in the next-year election, from January 31, 2009 to make the Plaintiff not elected.

2. 1. Finding residents, including G residents, who reside in the C Village, distributed a document stating the following: “Although residents collected expenses and collected D Construction, they would receive KRW 392,00,000 from H-Myeon Office to take them away, and F, the president of the E-company, used 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary tort of this case”). B.

The defendant on September 18, 2009.

The summary order of KRW 70,00,000 was issued by Jinwon District Court Jinwon District Court Branch Decision 2009 High Court Decision 5599 on the criminal facts that damaged the plaintiff's reputation by openly pointing out false facts, and the above order was finalized as it is.

C. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant suffered damages due to the Defendant’s primary tort by Jinwon District Court Decision 2009Gau7829, and filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages amounting to KRW 4 million for the loss of economic capacity due to the outbreak of scargic disease, etc., KRW 4 million for medical expenses due to scargic disease, KRW 4 million for future medical expenses, KRW 12 million for mental damage, and KRW 20 million for damages due to mental damage.

In the above lawsuit, the conciliation was concluded that the defendant pays 3 million won to the plaintiff by December 21, 2009.

On December 27, 2012, the Defendant does not have a sales of the NAV trees in the center for senior citizens in Sacheon-si Village on December 27, 2012, and in the absence of the Plaintiff’s sales of the NAV trees, the gue is an election of the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu may not move to. The NA is a bad Domine.