logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.21 2014누67569
출국기한유예불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

After the second part of the 18th part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part, "(Seoul Administrative Court 2014Guhap5521)" was added to "The above court rendered a ruling dismissing the plaintiff's claim on September 25, 2014, and the plaintiff appealed (Seoul High Court 2014Nu67514) and the above case is pending in the appellate court."

Part 10. The following shall be added to the following acts of the 7th page:

8) On August 25, 2014, the Plaintiff married with an O who is a national of the Republic of Korea, and theO currently is pregnant or pregnant (Evidence A 8-1 through 3) and such circumstances are circumstances that occurred after the instant disposition, and the validity of the instant disposition cannot be determined by taking into account such circumstances (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Du11843, Jan. 14, 2010). Considering such circumstances, it is difficult to deem that the instant disposition was abused or abused by discretionary authority in light of all the aforementioned circumstances.

2. The judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow