logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고정243
재물손괴
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, on February 19, 2017, around 20:46, thought that two maris were far away from the opening of the Ma in the following Ma Ma or in the later Ma Ma Ma in the place.

Accordingly, Defendant A opened a opening door and unclaimed 2 marine of the victim F in the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body.

The facts charged are that Defendant A conspiredd with Defendant B to commit a crime of damaging property, but Defendant B conspiredd with Defendant B to commit a crime as shown below.

Since there is a lack of evidence to view, it is corrected as above.

As a result, Defendant A destroyed the market price of 1.5 million won by allowing the victim to escape from the market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of goods, on-site photographs, investigation reports (on-site CCTV verification, etc.), investigation reports (on-site ctv video reproduction verification);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant A and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that Defendant A opened a iron hold to drink the dog as it is, and that the body structure of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of of

In light of this, it is desirable to be placed in a place near the area.

In the judgment of the court, the dogs were not taken into the opening, and the variety of the dogs is strong and long.

arrow