A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence against the defendant for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on October 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 22:00, the victim D (at the age of 39) with the Defendant’s male-friendly appearance E head on the hand floor; (b) caused bodily injury to the victim, such as catum catum, etc., requiring two-time medical treatment by breaking bating the victim’s bat, hair, hair, etc.; and (c) threatened the victim with dangerous articles by stating that “I will not be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Part concerning D statement in the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that applies to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the choice of punishment, Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that there is no fact of intimidation by the defendant's deception or knife, and the defendant's defense counsel.

According to the evidence of the court below, since the police officers called to the scene of the crime, D consistently stated that the police officers called Defendant A to Ga and then cut off the knife him, and that “I will not get off the knife” and “I will not get off the knife,” and that E took off the knife with the knife. The police officers made a consistent statement in this court, and the fact that the knife was taken by Defendant A’s hand immediately after the crime was committed, can be acknowledged, and in light of these facts, the above facts were taken.