The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. due to Possession of Mesamins among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles on vessel investigation.

In addition, the argument that the collection is unfair, among the grounds for appeal, for violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. from Sale and Purchase of Mesa-Pamins, is only asserted in the final appeal that the Defendant’s ground for appeal or the lower court did not consider it as being subject to an ex officio determination, and thus, it cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.