Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. (1) In regard to fraud against the victim F, the Defendant purchased the land for business progress to the victim F, and concluded that he completed the permission for the manufacture and distributor of oil, without deceiving the victim. The Defendant had the intent to repay and the ability to pay the investment to the victim F at the time of receiving the investment money.
(2) As to the crime of fraud against the victim H, the Defendant had the intent to repay and the ability to pay the investment to the victim H at the time of receiving the investment funds.
B. As to the punishments imposed by the lower court (as to the crimes listed in the [Attachment Table Nos. 1 to 11] on the punishment of unfair sentencing (as to the crimes listed in the [Attachment Table No. 2013 Highest 493 at the time of the sale] and the crimes listed in the [Attachment Table No. 2014 Highest 102]: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, the suspension of execution for three years, and the crimes listed in the [Attachment Table No. 12 or 14] of the Decision 2014 Highest 102: imprisonment for four months, the suspension of execution
2. Determination
A. Determination of misunderstanding of facts (the argument in the summary of the pleadings submitted by the defendant's defense counsel as of July 20, 2015 shall be determined within the scope of supplement in case of the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal submitted within the period for submission of the grounds of appeal) (1) The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below to determine the crime of fraud against the victim F. ① The defendant consistently stated to the effect that "the land for business was purchased, the permission for the manufacture and distributor of oil was completed, and the defendant may obtain profits from the sale of low-price waste oil, after the low-price waste oil was sold," and that the defendant made a statement to the effect that he invested in money (Articles 32, 670 of the evidence records, 45 of the trial record), ② the defendant made a statement to the effect that he would have invested in money in the victim F.