The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:05, driven a BA-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear and steering the steering gear well, and by safely operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded ahead of the same lane due to the negligence of driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle ahead of the same lane, and followed by the Dhurged vehicle of the victim Churg, the left part of the driver's left part of the vehicle of the Defendant, and the above Ahurg-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wurg-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wed vehicle, which is set up on the right side

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as brain, acute salvin, and salvinal sale, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence.

2. The above facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent in accordance with the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning

However, according to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on July 31, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.