A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2019, at Mapo-gu Seoul, and around 23:35 on December 23:3, 2019, the Defendant expressed a bath that D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mapo Police Station C District of the Seoul Mapo Police Station, intends to cause a defendant who is walking along the road, and was requested to present identification card and to confirm the circumstances of assault, the Defendant again putd the D into the second hand-site when the Defendant came to her left sloping.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of report;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence is that the defendant assaultss a police officer in the course of performing his/her duties, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the defendant does not have any record of crime beyond the fine, and there is no record of crime beyond the fine, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the same as the order