logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.29 2016고단733
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the front vehicle B.

On March 18, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 00:01, and proceeded along the three-lanes of the road in the 228-lane, Seo-gu, Seog-gu, Seog-gu, Seog-si, Seog-si, Seog-gu, Seog-si, Seog-si, in accordance with the two-lanes of the waterside, from the shot-

At the time, it is night and its location is an intersection installed with signal apparatus, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding in accordance with the frontline signals while lowering speed for drivers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and followed the front part of the victim C(54) driving of the victim C(54 years old) driving to the left side of the front vehicle of the front body of the front body, which is proceeding in accordance with the new line from the boundary of the hospital located in the Chungcheongbuk-do by negligence in violation of the signal, and led to the shock of the shock, and led to the left side of the victim E(38 years old) driving, which was turned back to the elebbbbbing side at the front body of the front body.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as catum salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim G (49) who is the passenger of the said taxi, without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victims by immediately stopping the vehicle with approximately KRW 1,507,418 while causing injury to the victim E, such as catum base and tension, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant got about KRW 1,507,418 of repair cost. The Defendant attempted to escape without stopping the vehicle with approximately KRW 2,815,248 of repair cost to the victim of the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. 교통사고 보고⑴⑵( 실황 조사서)

1. A report on investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis (C, G, and E);

1. Written estimate (D, F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles under consideration and photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Each of the relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts of crime;

arrow