1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. 1st floor of the cement machine and bridge roof above the Seoul Northern-gu Seoul Northern-gu C wallprove roof, 1st floor.

1. On August 22, 201, the Plaintiff’s order 1-A to the Defendant on August 22, 201, comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as evidence No. 1.

The fact that the real estate stated in paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) was leased with a lease deposit of KRW 40 million, monthly rent of KRW 350,000,000, and the lease term from September 22, 2011 to September 22, 2013; thereafter, the lease term of the said lease is extended from September 22, 2015 to September 22, 2015; however, the Plaintiff was not paid KRW 13,650,000 in total from May 22, 2012 to August 21, 2015; and on June 16, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that the said lease was terminated on the grounds that the lease was terminated for the reason that the lease was terminated for the reason that the lease was overdue.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, since the lease contract on the instant real estate was lawfully terminated by delivery of content certification containing the intention of termination, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the monthly rent of KRW 13,650,000 from August 22, 2015 to August 22, 2015, or the monthly rent of KRW 350,000 each month from the date of termination of the lease contract to the date of delivery of the instant real estate without any legal cause.

B. As to this, the Defendant asserted that there exists an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to extend the term of the above lease by March 10, 2016, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.