logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.02 2016누54314
유족보상금부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff in the trial does not differ from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the statement of evidence No. 11-1 and No. 11-3, which was additionally submitted to the court of first instance, is neglected, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's assertion

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement concerning this case is that the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except where the statement of No. 9, No. 11-1 through 3 of the first instance judgment and the fact-finding with respect to the National Maritime Survey Agency of this Court, and the statement of No. 15 of the third part is deemed to be "No. 9, No. 11-1 through No. 3 of the second part of the first instance judgment," and the "No. 15" of the third part is deemed to be "No. 1-2 of the first instance judgment," and therefore, it is acceptable as

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow