1. The Defendant removed the greenhouse installed on the land of 2,567 square meters in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, and the said land.

1. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 3-1, and Eul evidence No. 3-2, each of the statements and arguments as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff leased the land of this case to the defendant around 2005 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"), which is owned by the plaintiff (hereinafter "the land of this case"), and cultivated crops by installing a plastic house (hereinafter "the instant plastic house") on the land of this case from around that time, and the defendant notified the defendant of the termination of the lease of this case on March 14, 2017. According to the above facts of recognition, the lease contract of this case is deemed to have been lawfully terminated and terminated on September 14, 2017, pursuant to Article 635 of the Civil Act. Thus, the defendant is obligated to remove the vinyl house of this case and deliver the land of this case to the plaintiff, barring any special circumstances.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. On July 31, 2014, the Defendant asserted that the instant land was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff by setting the term of lease from July 31, 2014 to March 31, 2020, and thus, the Defendant cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim.

B. In the event that the authenticity of the seal imprint affixed to a document is withdrawn by his seal, barring any special circumstance, the authenticity of the seal imprint shall be presumed to have been created, i.e., the act of affixing the seal based on the will of the person who prepared the document. On the other hand, when the authenticity of the seal imprint is presumed, the authenticity of the document is presumed to have been created pursuant to Article 358 of the Civil Procedure Act, but such presumption is broken if it is proved that the act of affixing the seal was made by a person other than the person who prepared the document. Thus, the document presenter bears the responsibility to prove that the act of affixing the seal is based on the legitimate title delegated by the person who prepared the document.