logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.02.18 2015고단943
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the primary facts charged in this case

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is engaged in the freight transport business with three corporations called D, E and F Co., Ltd., and the present G treatmentler vehicle is currently registered as the ownership of E Co., Ltd., Henz, the vehicle of Henz is owned by D, and the vehicle of I Trler is owned by F Co., Ltd., respectively.

On February 3, 2014, the Defendant, at the branch of the SP Don-dong, Nam-gu, Busan on February 3, 2014, would make payment for the period of 48 months each month to J, a business employee of the victim SP Gan-do, “If the Defendant wishes to purchase the vehicle of the G treatment 80 million won, and if the funds are insufficient, the Defendant would make payment for 20,025,166 won each month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, on January 14, 2014, the Defendant offered a vehicle as security and obtained a loan of KRW 79.6 million from Ariju Capital. On August 26, 2013, the Defendant provided a vehicle as security and borrowed KRW 90 million from Ariju Capital. In addition, around August 26, 2013, the Defendant did not have the ability to repay KRW 205,166 each month even if he/she received a loan of KRW 10 million from the Busan Bank’s business operator, credit loans of KRW 10 million, cooperative loans of KRW 10 million, KRW 10 million, KRW 80-50 million, and KRW 80 million,000,000,000.

The defendant deceivings the employees of the victimized person as above and took out a loan of KRW 80,000,000 as the purchase cost for the Tracler vehicle to be treated from the damaged person.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim’s employee in charge of loans to the Defendant by confirming the details of the Defendant’s loans to financial institutions and the repayment plan around February 2014, and the Defendant’s credit status is appropriate as a result of the above loan qualification examination. The victim around February 3, 2014.

arrow