The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects the defendant.

B. However, in full view of various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, background, and circumstance after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, even if the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. In so doing, it is not determined that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if it is considered that the circumstances favorable to the Defendant as seen earlier are considered in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was punished for fraud seven times; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; (c) the Defendant did not agree with the victim; and (d)

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.