logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.08.11 2016고단952
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is C’s business owner in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu.

When an employer retires, the accused is obligated to pay all money and valuables, such as wages, to the worker for not more than 14 days.

However, the Defendant did not pay KRW 1,482,00 as wages for March 2015, out of D’s wages that were retired from C through C from January 8, 2014 to March 26, 2015, within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline between them.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

B. Indication of the victim’s non-existence of punishment after the prosecution of the instant case

(c) Dismissal of public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow