1. The Defendant’s KRW 53,786,474 as well as 5% per annum from March 16, 2013 to July 18, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is an organization consisting of the occupants for the management of 138 households located in Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and the Defendant is a project proprietor who newly built and sold the instant apartment.

The apartment of this case was constructed by the Defendant as a part of public construction rental housing through the National Housing Fund. On June 11, 1999, the inspection was conducted by the head of Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, which was conducted by the head of Seo-gu, Daejeon, and on June 11, 2004, the sale procedure was conducted after the lapse of five years from the lease period

B. As of the date of the above pre-use inspection, there were defects in the apartment in the section for common use and section for exclusive use due to the non-construction, erroneous construction, and defective construction from the time of the above pre-use inspection. Accordingly, the apartment of this case caused trouble in the function, safety, or aesthetic view to the apartment of this case. Since 2005, the plaintiff continuously requested the repair of defects in the apartment of this case, and the defendant continuously requested the repair of defects in the apartment of this case, and the part of the apartment of this case was also performing the repair of defects.

[In accordance with the appraiser C’s appraisal result, the area ratio of the front map is merely 15.10%, and it is deemed sufficient to conduct the partial map as remuneration for rupture rupture rupture rupture rupture rupture rupture rupture rupture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture routture supture routture routture supture routture routture routture supture - 3,817,402 won - - 32,311,754 won - 38,222,63 won -12,531 won - - 4,274,2884 won - -28.