The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, two hundred hours of community service order, and forty hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) is too unfford and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a very dangerous crime that may cause unexpected behaviors to the life and home of others as well as the possibility of traffic accidents. It is necessary to strictly punish the defendant. The defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case was considerably high by 0.192%. The defendant changed the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, resulting in an injury to six victims, including the above victims, due to the shock of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, resulting in an injury requiring treatment of two through one week, etc. It is not good that the contents of the crime of this case are not agreed with the victims. The defendant did not agree with the victims. The defendant was a fine of KRW 70,000 for a summary order of KRW 10,000 for a fine of KRW 10,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act of KRW 70,074 on November 3, 200 and KRW 15,000 for a fine of KRW 10,000 for a violation of the alcohol level of Seoul District Court.

However, the fact that the defendant is deeply divided and reflected in the crime of this case, the vehicle of this case operated by the defendant is expected to have been compensated for the victims of the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents because the vehicle of this case was covered by comprehensive insurance, and the vehicle of this case is no longer driven, such as selling the vehicle used for the crime of this case on October 24, 2019.