1.On a request for change in exchange at the time of the trial,

A. between 'N&D Co., Ltd. and the Defendant

1. The reasoning for this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The fifth 9th 9th thm of the judgment of the court of first instance is moving the "new act" into the "unlawful act".

(b) the fifth fourteenth sentence of the first instance judgment is to read the "2010Da11408" to the "2010Da11408".

(c) the 7th seventh of the Decision of the first instance, “5,814.427 Won” in the 535,814.427, shall be read as “5,814,427 Won”;

From the 15th to the 21st of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall be followed:

[1] As seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s right to pledge of this case should be revoked within the limit of 23,845 shares, upon the Plaintiff’s request, within the limit of 23,845 shares (22,470 won) calculated by dividing the amount of preserved bonds (535,814,427 won) by the value of shares (22,470 won). Meanwhile, based on the instant pledge, the Defendant seized 76,533 shares of the subject matter of the instant pledge pursuant to the Gwangju District Court Order No. 2013Ma968, Jan. 23, 2013, based on the instant pledge, the lower court did not have any other dispute over the transfer of shares between the Defendant and the parties to the instant pledge of this case, based on the fact that it was impossible for the Defendant to exercise the right to pledge of this case to transfer shares by means of the said Order No. 2013ta2507, May 29, 2013.

However, even if restitution should be made by the method of compensation for value, it is an obligee.