Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 22, 2013, at around 22:20 on April 22, 2013, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the business of the victim’s main store business by force between approximately 40 minutes, and interfered with the victim’s main store business by avoiding disturbance, such as drinking bareboat bareboat bareboat and bareboat bareboat bareboat bareboat bareboat with visitors and his table bareboat bareboat bareboat bareboat bareboats, and booming bareboats.

2. The Defendants of the obstruction of performance of official duties committed an assault to the police officer’s duties on site mobilization by committing an act of assaulting him, such as flabing the flab of the said G, which was called “a flabing flab, flab, and flab,” and walking the flab of the said G, and Defendant B interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s duties on site mobilization by committing an act of assaulting him, such as flabing the flab of the said G, which was called out upon receipt of the said report at the said time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1), 30, 136(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a sentence: The defendant several times of violence, and in particular, on April 14, 2005, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced a fine of two million won for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and on March 2, 2011, the same court issued a summary order of three million won for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., the defendant B selected to impose a fine: Selection of a fine, considering that the same court has

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution (Defendant A) Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, that there is an agreement with the victim D, that there is no record of punishment of imprisonment without prison labor or more severe punishment, etc.