1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 14, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) visa on July 14, 2013, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on September 30, 2013.

B. On June 19, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would suffer from persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On July 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is Magbo-do, Maba, Maba, Maba-Ma, Maba-ro, Magba-do, Maba-do.

The Islamic level diagnosis chain installed explosives to the church located in the Islamic Republic of Korea on December 27, 2012. As a result, the church collapses, at least 50 believers were killed and at least 300 wounded, and the Plaintiff’s mother and the Plaintiff’s son died in the process.

The plaintiff reported the above explosives terrorism to the police on January 3, 2013, and the knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife were rescued by the police.

In September 2013, the plaintiff came to go to the Republic of Korea after departure from Austria, and the plaintiff became a member of Bocoasia, which became a member of Bocoas.

If the plaintiff returned to his own country, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee despite the possibility of persecution from Bocoon.