logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.24 2018가단513586
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of two residential facilities and detached houses in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, D 88 square meters (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s land”), and the general steel framed branch, and two residential facilities and detached houses on its ground, and the Defendant purchased and acquired the land of the Plaintiff on March 11, 2013, E-gi-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter “instant Defendant’s land”).

B. After acquiring the Defendant’s land, the Defendant, in the process of constructing a new house on the Defendant’s land, laid down part of the Plaintiff’s land in the instant case, and subsequently, caused a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the part (hereinafter “other parts of the instant land”).

C. On August 20, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agreement with the following major contents (hereinafter “instant agreement”), and a notary public certified by the law firm F.

The portion in front E in Suwon-si of the agreement refers to approximately one square meter in front of the agreement and D boundary points in Suwon-si of Suwon-si ( approximately one square meter in size in front of the agreement).

shall be merged with each other after completion of the E.

However, this Agreement shall be null and void at the time of division, and the present portion of the relationship refers to the other part of this case.

A shall not raise any objection against B, and if a partition is made only on a rectangular-type land, it shall be transferred to the owner, and B shall actively cooperate with the owner in the above contents, and A shall pay all the expenses (division survey expenses and notarial expenses).

After the agreement of this case, the Defendant accumulated a fence on the front part of the instant land in accordance with the agreement with the Plaintiff. In accordance with the agreement of this case, the Plaintiff obtained cooperation from the Defendant on February 2015, and applied for permission to engage in development activities (land division) on the front part of the instant land (one square meter), and accordingly, on March 23, 2015, real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) on the Defendant’s land.

arrow