A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

All applications for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

From February 2, 2013 to February 27, 2014, the Defendant operated a protemary specialized company with the trade name, "C-C-Wlue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plue Plux" on the second floor of the Busan Shipping Daegu building B to around 320 square meters

1. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement as to the victim D’s payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the price of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the pre-payment of the

However, at the time, the Defendant started the business by opening the “Cench” as above, but around that time, the Defendant was faced with the situation where the prote specialized company in the name of approximately 900 square meters, which corresponds to the three times of Defendant’s business size, started the business, making it difficult for the Defendant to gain actual profits due to the deepening business progress, and making it difficult for the Defendant to do so. Moreover, the Defendant had already been fully liable for excessive debts, such as 3.4 billion won loans from the Daegu Bank while carrying out the said business, and 3.81.2 million won loans from the land owners, such as F, etc., while the Defendant was unable to appropriately pay the employees’ benefits under the circumstances where there was no clear way to solve, and thus, the Defendant was under the circumstances where the Defendant was using approximately KRW 70 million loans from Daegu Bank and Busan Bank as the Defendant’s operating capital, and thus, the decrete project was normally carried out in the future, and thus, there was no intention to return the remainder or its ability to return the remainder on the date.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the said victim D, received KRW 1920,00 from the victim on March 15, 2014.

(b) it;