Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, who is operating a set of “C” in a racing-si, and “E” to introduce the victim D with a phone to “E”, “E” to be working at the multilateral bank on the face of remittance.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim as a prepaid payment, he was thought to use it as his own living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to introduce female employees who will work in the above multiples.

The Defendant received 4,200,000 won from the victim on the same day at around 17:12 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of bankbook transactions;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is 20 times or more that the Defendant was punished as a crime of fraud under the same water law as the instant crime, and it is reasonable to strictly punish the Defendant on the ground that it is not good to commit the instant crime, such as committing the instant crime, even though it is a repeated crime

However, in light of the fact that the defendant was issued a summary order or sentenced to a fine for other fraudulent crimes committed during the period of repeated crime, such as the crime in this case, the victim does not want the punishment, the crime in this case cannot be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant during the period of repeated crime, and it is judged that the punishment is too heavy compared to the contents of the crime, and the defendant is able to faithfully live while working as the job placement office or employee of the gas station.