1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance (the result of the inquiry about Lat Hospital chief of this court) was presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the term “certificate of early June 3, 2016” in the first sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed as the term “certificate of early June 1, 2016”; and (b) the term “waste” in the 9th tenth sentence is deemed as “debrising”; and (c) it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, (d) it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.