logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.07.10 2019가단141104
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 32,64,726 and the interest rate of KRW 12% per annum from December 6, 2019 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 15, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on cooperation between the Plaintiff and E, which is a company engaged in various manufacturing, distribution, and distribution business of fine-water, and used the F’s brand owned by E (hereinafter “E”) with E (hereinafter “E”) on May 15, 2018 for the Plaintiff to produce the above meat and spice and to exclusively sell the Plaintiff’s products.

(2) According to the partnership agreement of this case, “E” refers to “the instant partnership agreement” and “E” refers to “the number of dead country waters and the quantity of fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorine fluorite,” and “E” refers to “the total amount of 30% fluorine flu

In addition, the term of the above partnership contract was one year from the date of the contract, but it was automatically extended for one year if there is no separate declaration between the plaintiff and E after the contract expires.

B. The Plaintiff’s sales of the goods to G Co., Ltd. and the Defendant supplied the instant dead-age trees and the spice table to G Co., Ltd., which was entrusted with the manufacture of the instant dead-age trees, etc. from June 22, 2018 to February 28, 2019, pursuant to the instant partnership agreement.

As the business partner who was requested from E to process dead State water, etc. was changed to the defendant from G Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with the land of the instant dead State water and the Monobium, etc. from April 30, 2019 to October 4, 2019.

C. The Plaintiff’s developments leading to the increase in the price of the inland water in this case are 300g g the inland water in this case to G and the Defendant.

arrow