All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the defendant's appeal is unfair because the defendant's punishment (2 million won in penalty) is too large, and the prosecutor's grounds for appeal are too unfeasible and unfair.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant interfered with his duties as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below to make it difficult for the Defendant to normally operate and make it difficult for him to receive a report; and (b) the Defendant assaults the police who called upon receiving a report; (c) the Defendant appears to have caused the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s mental disorder, such as bad circumstances or stimulative disorder, appears to have caused the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s symptoms are against the Defendant; (e) the Defendant’s symptoms are reported; (e) the situation was early recovered upon the recognition of the Defendant’s symptoms; (e) the I and Sari or manager, who submitted an agreement at the court below to the court below to avoid the Defendant’s disturbance; and (e) the sentence imposed on the Defendant does not seem to be unreasonable and too heavy or so it is unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is all groundless, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That the " September 16, 2015" of the criminal facts of the judgment of the court below is obvious that it is a clerical error in the " September 17, 2015", and thus, correction is to be made.