logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.12 2016나83886
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 18,779,702 against the Plaintiff among the judgment of the court of first instance, and its amount from September 3, 2014 to October 12, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C is a person who runs the place of business of “D” (hereinafter “instant place of business”) that sells the Dogrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgr

B. Even if the Defendant is not an operator of gas facilities under the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Safety Control and Business Act (hereinafter “ Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act”), on May 3, 2012, the Defendant, at the request of C, additionally installed a kind of water (NAG storage vessel - metal pipes - metal pipes 1) connected to LPG storage vessel to low-tension gas, to remove existing gas pipes and connect this part to rubber oil. On July 2012, 2012, the Defendant additionally installed a device used to change the first pressure high-pressure gas connected to the LPG storage vessel into low-tension gas (NAV chemical abuse advance). The Defendant also installed a model of a pressure valve that controls and maintains the gas supply pressure at a certain pressure (NAV boiler’s own terms) in the order of LPG storage vessel - a photographic pressure between the Defendant and the rubber tank - a photographic pressure installed by the Defendant.

C. At around 20:00 on May 9, 2013, an explosion accident occurred due to gas leakage near the horse in the instant workplace.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

The results of the investigation of the instant accident are as follows.

(1) Korea Gas Safety Corporation’s accident investigation report (A evidence 7) site status - According to C’s statement, the pipe gate heading around a week before a day, cut off the ice due to the leakage from the pipe gate due to the temperature of the pipe gate, and cut off.

arrow