(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.01.27 2014고단4300

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.01.27 2014고단4300

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around May 2012, the Defendant became aware of the victim D (the social index 20, the social age 6) while working in the “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. On September 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent the text message to a police officer at the river basin in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) deleted the phone number of the Handphone used by the sender for hiding the fact that he/she is the Defendant; and (c) sent the text message containing the bronphones to the victim several times.

Since the defendant sent the above text message to another person, the defendant did not have the sender of the text message, who is the other party to the lawsuit, and the defendant was employed as the prosecutor, although the defendant did not hold the office as the prosecutor of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, the defendant's defect in the lawsuit that "if the defendant was the public prosecutor of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office and the person sending the abusive language, 4 of the witness send the abusive language to us, and 50,000 won in cash to the public prosecutor in charge, who ordered the perpetrator to give money to 4 of the four of the witness, should bring a lawsuit against the perpetrator, and 50,000 won in cash, as litigation costs, the defendant received 50,000 won in cash from the victim as stated in the attached Table 1 of the Crimes Day, and received 1060,000 won in total from the victim under the pretext of agreement, attorney-at-law's access cost, gift inspection cost, gift inspection cost, and sexual violence from the victim."

2. On September 2013, the Defendant who attempted to commit fraud ought to file an application for prohibition of access to property with the victim, first of all, in order to prevent the witness from approaching the two places of the victim’s house in order to prevent the victim from approaching the two places of the victim’s house.

Prohibition of access.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.02.13 2012고단5828

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.04.21 2017고단122

-서울서부지방법원 2012.06.28 2012고정947

-서울북부지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고단1143

-서울북부지방법원 2020.11.10 2019나39537