A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-two years.

One (Evidence No. 1) seized shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 High 648" is a foreigner of Japanese nationality, the victim C (V, 65 years old) is a defendant married to Japan on August 11, 2009, and the victim D (V, 75 years old) is a second sentence of the above victim C, and is a second sentence of the defendant.

On March 5, 2011, the Defendant entered Korea along with his wife, and resided with his wife at the residence of the wife 111 Dong 608, Dong 111, Dong 608, and left Korea without having any particular occupation. On April 5, 2017, the Defendant left Korea to Japan and stayed in Japan for a period of four months, and used the above national pension for the purpose of investment in non-Internet transactions with payment of the above national pension, and used approximately two million won transferred by his wife during the above period for investment in the above foreign exchange transactions, and continued to transport 30,000 UN to his wife.

The wife's refusal to return to Korea, but the wife had the opportunity to punish 100 million UN on the wind that the wife refuses to return to Korea, and had the complaint against the wife.

Even after returning to Korea on August 18, 2017, the Defendant is going to and from Japan to continue to operate an Internet foreign exchange transaction investment business to his wife.

On August 23, 2017, the applicant demanded money from the wife and the wife refused any conflict with the wife. On the other hand, at the inside of the above residence, the Defendant was released from cash (150 thousand won, 100 thousand won) and real estate-related documents owned by the wife, such as the registration certificate of the above residence, and returned the above things to the wife after taking out the vehicle owned by the wife and being called the police from the wife, and during the process, the wife was found on July 25, 2017 when the wife was staying in Japan from the Defendant's home while the wife was staying in Japan from the Defendant's home, and the wife thought that the Defendant would have returned to Japan due to the theft of the wife's property and returned to Japan, and then the Defendant was no longer divorced from the Defendant with the Defendant.