The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that the Defendant: (a) at the time of the instant case, franchising a high level of franchising with franchising that franchising the franchising of franchising that franchising had been inflicted by the victim; (b) franchising the victim’s franchising part of the victim’s chest; (c) franchising the victim’s chest even franchising hand, etc., did not constitute an indecent act; and (d) the Defendant did not have exercised the victim’s franchising part of the victim’s chest at the time of committing an indecent act.

2. Determination

가. 추행의 고의 및 추행 행위가 있었는지 여부에 관하여 피고인은 ‘피해자가 점퍼의 지퍼를 열어놓은 상태로 주머니에 손을 넣고 있다가 피고인이 점퍼의 안감을 만지는 순간 피해자가 놀랐는지 몸을 움츠렸고 그 순간 피고인은 왼쪽 손등이 피해자의 몸에 닿았다는 것을 느끼고 당황하였지만 나쁜 의도가 아니었다는 것을 표현하기 위하여 피해자와 그 일행의 점퍼를 한 번 더 만져보고는 그 자리를 떴을 뿐 피해자가 거부하는데도 계속 손등이 가슴 부위에 스치게 한 사실이 없고, 피해자가 울면서 뛰어간 사실도 없다’라는 취지로 진술하였다

(6) On the other hand, the court below's determination that the defendant's above statement was just and acceptable, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below.

① At the court of the court below, the victim's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's outer son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son'