logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고단144
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on August 24, 2012, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on October 16, 2014, and the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on October 16, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 17, 201

1. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the award) and violates the Road Traffic Act (the measure not yet taken after an accident).

On July 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol on July 30, 2016, and proceeded at the speed of the city in accordance with the two-sking shooting distance from the mountainside, which was located in the southwest-gu, Ulsan to the intersection of the king Sgyeong-gu.

At this point, traffic signals are installed, and on the opposite side, there are vehicles standing in the signal signal atmosphere, so there was a duty of care to take account of the traffic situation of the front side and the right side and the right side, and to prevent the occurrence of accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and the right side and the right side, while maintaining the lane.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant was running along the central line of the flag in the intersection while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, the part of the victim D's flag in front of the flaging car, which was trying to proceed along the two-lanes opposite to the flag in the intersection, was moved into the left-hand part of the Defendant’s flag in front of the flaging car, and the said flag was pushed back by the said flag, thereby getting the victim’s flag or the front-hand part of the flag of the flag taxi, which was stopped after the said flaging car was behind the flag.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence caused the victim D’s salt, tensions, etc. to require approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim F to undergo approximately two-day treatment.

arrow