logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.06.10 2020고단1614
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on November 18, 2010, and was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court on August 22, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 13, 2020, at around 23:41, the Defendant driven a dial car with Dent alcohol concentration of about 3-4 meters from the Alley Park Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to the front road of Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.110%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant, who was punished twice due to drunk driving, is subject to criticism.

However, the driving distance is short and there are circumstances that can be considered in the circumstances leading up to driving, and the fact that the driving is not possible again is considered as favorable factors, and the degree of other driving, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, and environment, etc. as shown in the records of this case shall be determined as ordered by considering the various sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records of this case.

arrow