logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.12.16 2016나9668
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the application of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court on the parts in question, “Defendant A” shall be applied to both “Defendant A”.

Of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, all Defendant B shall be referred to as “B”.

From 3th to 15th of the judgment of the first instance court, “Defendant A has the obligation to deliver the instant apartment to Defendant B, and Defendant B has the obligation to pay KRW 35 million to the Plaintiff at the same time as the delivery of the instant apartment from Defendant A,” and the Defendant has committed the instant apartment to “The Defendant has the obligation to deliver the instant apartment to B.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendant should be accepted as it is reasonable, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow