Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
(2019No. 473) On May 16, 2019, the Defendant was exposed to G, on the road front of the C, E zone E zone of E zone of E zone of E zone of E zone of E zone of E, 201, the Defendant was driving a D large-scale 80 Obama on May 16, 2019, while driving a D large-scale 80 Obama.
The Defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s request for a alcohol test without justifiable grounds, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol at the time, the face is red, and drinking so as to make a drinking reduction in drinking, etc., and the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a alcohol test by inserting the dnife in a drinking measuring instrument by inserting the dnife F and policeman G.
(2) The Defendant asserted that the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, was unable to take a drinking test in response to the police officer’s request for a drinking test. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the instant court: (i) the police officer prepared a report that the Defendant refused to take a drinking test; (ii) the blood alcohol concentration was confirmed if the Defendant took a drinking test in response to the demand for a drinking test; and (iii) the Defendant’s blood content was notified to the Defendant; and (iv) the process of obtaining confirmation from the notification should have been conducted; and (v) the Defendant refused to take a drinking test as stated in the instant crime (the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable) around June 14:50, 2019, considering that the Defendant’s blood alcohol content was confirmed at the time of the instant case or there was no objection to this, the Defendant was found to have refused a drinking test as stated in the Defendant’s crime (the Defendant’s assertion is not accepted); (v) around 14:50, 2019>
The defendant is not aware of the situation at the time of the instant case.