logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.10.10 2014가단215045 (1)
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. Each insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is invalid.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On April 29, 2011, the Plaintiff concluded each insurance contract with the Defendant listed in the separate sheet.

(1) The Defendant received hospital treatment for a total of 183 days from August 4, 201 to May 13, 201 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). From 10.3 to 10.3, the Plaintiff claimed insurance proceeds from 20.3 of the above 20-1, 10-1, 20-1, 20-3, 20-1, 20-1, 36-1, 20-1, 20-3, 20-1, 36-1, 20-1, 20-1, 36-1, 20-3, 20-1, 20-1, 36-1, 20-1, 20-3, 20-1, 205, 20-3, 20-1, 206-1, 201, 20-3, 201, 3-1,20-1,2,013.

However, regarding hospital treatment No. 6, the above [Attachment 1] refused to pay insurance money and filed a principal suit of this case.

From April 29, 2011 to July 25, 2011, the Defendant, including the instant insurance contract, concluded a total of 12 insurance contracts with multiple insurance companies including the Plaintiff, and the insured as shown below [Attachment 2].

However, the insurance contract of this case and the content and nature of coverage are different.

arrow