A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on June 6, 2017, at around 22:20, the police officer E (25) belonging to the D District Police Station of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant kidss down in C cafeteria located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and was aware of the Defendant’s wife F., the Defendant took place at the Defendant’s own f.e., her own f., and her f.e., her f., her f., her f., her f., and her f., her f., her f.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted E and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the duty of 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Jautron G (57 years old, south) and relative investigations;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The criteria for sentencing for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendations] The sentence shall be determined in full view of the following conditions of sentencing, including the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., as a whole, in the basic area (from June to June, 1), the sentence of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendations] that interferes with the performance of official duties.

- the recognition of crimes and reflects that there may have been a history of punishment due to the nature of crime, poorness and violence