1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

3. Total costs of litigation are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is the same as that of the column of reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiffs asserted that they claim increase in the compensation for expropriation for each of the instant lands, the instant obstacles, etc., and business losses.

However, on August 22, 2014, in order to receive a payment claim for the amount of the feed price owed to the Plaintiffs, the fact that the Plaintiffs acquired all the above payment claim against the Defendant from the Plaintiffs, and that the Defendant, the garnishee on October 29, 2014, was notified of the above content to the Defendant, who was the garnishee on October 29, 2014, is no dispute between the parties (However, the Plaintiffs do not withdraw from this lawsuit even if they are aware of all the above assignment of claims). The fact that the above company participated in the trial as the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff on October 30, 2014 and accepted the decision of recommending a compromise in this court with the Defendant, thereby cancelling the litigation relationship between

Therefore, the Plaintiffs lose the standing to claim the increase in the compensation for expropriation of this case without having to leave the said subject matter as seen above, and thus, the instant lawsuit is unlawful.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is unlawful and thus all of the lawsuits of this case are dismissed. Since the decision of the court of first instance is unfair, the decision of the court of first instance shall be revoked and all of the plaintiffs' lawsuits