The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered is too unreasonable (4 million won of punishment, 40 hours of a sexual assault treatment program, 40 hours of a sexual assault treatment program, confiscation).

2. The judgment of the court below is a primary offender who has no record of punishment, and the defendant seems to have suffered economic difficulties. However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have been taken by the defendant in the toilet, and the nature of the crime is bad. In particular, the victim D, a child of 11 years old, appears to have received considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case, the defendant did not agree with the victims, and other factors of sentencing specified in the records of this case such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and therefore the defendant's argument is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is obvious that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.