The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in sentencing (the sentence of the lower court: two years of imprisonment; the Defendant, at the first trial date, dismissed the allegation of misunderstanding the legal principles on the grounds of appeal)

2. The lower court, under the unfavorable circumstances where the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had committed a repeated crime due to the same crime, determined a sentence by taking account of the Defendant’s criminal history, age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the instant crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s criminal history, age, sexual conduct, motive and means of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime.

The grounds for the unfair sentencing of the defendant (the confessions of the defendant to commit the crime of this case and reflects the defendant) appears to have been sufficiently considered in determining the punishment against the defendant, and the above conditions of the sentencing have changed in the trial.

There is no circumstance to see the above sentencing conditions, and considering the above sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below is determined to be reasonable within the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.