logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.08.21 2018고정437
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

The Defendant sold CG car to B while driving with a heavy-sturdr in the car trading company in the same ducheon-si, but due to the problem of the operation of the CG car, B demanded repair costs to the Defendant. In order to meet the above repair costs, the Defendant and B conspired to cause a traffic accident caused intentionally by the central line, and to claim repair costs, etc. to the Hyundai Marine Co., Ltd. owned by the Defendant by a private person driving DG car insurance in the DG car that is owned by the Defendant.

On March 18, 2016, at around 00:45, the Defendant and B claimed insurance money from the victim company under the name of repair expenses, etc. on March 22, 2016, on the one-lane road in front of the New Stack-si, Dong-si, Dong-si, Dong-si, where the Defendant driving a DKaren car on the one-lane road, which he gets driven by the central line, and he gets driven by B on the opposite vehicle line, and he gets a traffic accident before the driver's seat of the CG car with E on the front line, and the Defendant claimed insurance money from the victim company under the name of repair expenses, etc. on or around March 23, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 530,000,000 from the victim company under the pretext of an agreement between B and 500,000,000 won on March 23, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written opinion;

1. An investigation report (Submission of data regarding the details of payments at sea of modern times);

1. Application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 347(1) and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The point of time and reflection of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order, and the point of view as a result of the proposal B, is presumed to be in accordance with the reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1).

arrow